Story thread · 2 reports / 2 sources
Key evidence exposes dark truth about Trump's $1.8B slush fund: analysis
rawstory.com · 3h · first report
How the coverage leans
Across 2 sources · syndicated copies counted once
The Trump administration will be back in federal court Friday fighting to end a lawsuit that has kept its controversial $1.8 billion "anti-weaponization" fund frozen — without ever agreeing to swear the fund is truly finished, according to a new analysis. U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema, who indefinitely blocked the fund in June, will hear the government's bid to dismiss the case in Virginia, but her ruling offered the administration an off-ramp, reported MS NOW's Fallon Gallagher . "When Brinkema blocked the fund, she gave the government an opportunity to declare — under penalty of perjury — that it would not move forward with the fund in any way, shape or form in the future," Gallagher wrote. "If they did that, she indicated she would likely dismiss the case." The government never filed that declaration. Instead, Attorney General Todd Blanche posted an unsigned rescission notice on social media in August, stating that the fund's founding order "is rescinded and shall have no forc
The coverage
- Trump officials 'still fighting' to keep 'slush fund' alive: legal expert
alternet.org · 3h
Leans leftThis article: leans left.
The conversation · 0
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet — start the thread.