Story thread · 3 reports / 3 sources
AI-generated text should be detectable, but Apple needs to avoid Anthropic’s huge error
9to5mac.com · 5h · first report
How the coverage leans
Across 3 sources · syndicated copies counted once
As someone who writes for a living, you would correctly guess that I’m wholeheartedly in favour of allowing AI -generated text to be detectable and marked as such. There’s just a ridiculous amount of AI slop out there, and an “AI content” label means I don’t need to waste my time reading any of it. However, Anthropic has just announced that it’s complying with an EU initiative to have Claude watermark AI-generated text, but doing so in a particularly perverse manner …
The coverage
- Anthropic rolls out new ai text watermarking system on Claude – here’s what to know
independent.co.uk · 57m
- Claude to start watermarking AI-generated text – but will it make quality worse?
theguardian.com · 2h
The conversation · 0
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet — start the thread.