Story thread · 4 reports / 4 sources

The cost and burden of avoiding ‘forever chemicals’ should not fall on parents | Letter

theguardian.com · 12d

The cost and burden of avoiding ‘forever chemicals’ should not fall on parents | Letter

How the coverage leans

Leans leftCoverage lean: Leans left. 1 left, 2 center, 0 right.

Across 4 sources · syndicated copies counted once

Kendal Archer says it is the government’s responsibility to legislate and big agriculture’s responsibility not to cover our food in chemicals I read your article ( ‘Forever chemicals’ linked to gut inflammation in children after early exposure, 24 July ) on prenatal and early-life exposure to Pfas leading to higher levels of intestinal inflammation in children – and by extension colorectal cancer – with interest. I’m a mum of two. Since my first pregnancy, I have grappled with the endless advice and contradictions on health. Should I use glass bottles of non-organic milk, or plastic bottles of organic milk. Organic broccoli wrapped in plastic, or plastic-free non-organic broccoli. Continue reading...

First report: ‘Forever chemicals’ could be aging dolphins beyond their years sciencenews.org, 14d

The coverage

  1. Claros Technologies raises $55M to step up destruction of ‘forever chemicals’

    startribune.com · 12d

  2. Proposed ban of forever chemicals for California farms nixed by state lawmakers

    latimes.com · 12d

The conversation · 0

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet — start the thread.